Recognition & Respect?

UNIT 2 PORTAL with ranksAt the University of Manitoba, a notable percentage of courses are taught by Sessional Academic Workers (Unit 2) with a smaller number taught by Student Academic Workers (Unit 1).  CUPE 3909 believes that these teachers make important contributions to the student experience and to education but working conditions do not usually reflect those efforts.

The CUPE 3903 campaign “A Better York is Possible” recently posted a video that outlines the contributions of Contract Faculty despite the difficulties of this precarious employment model.

In the US, these educators are often called Adjuncts and there is a growing recognition of the worsening working conditions of these workers.  An article in the New Yorker addresses the fact that most students are not aware that some of their instructors are precariously employed.

 

Academic Worker Locals in Ontario are on strike

Post Doc, Grad, and Undergraduate Student Academic Workers (CUPE 3902 Unit 1) are on strike at the University of Toronto.  The U of T has not increased the student funding package since 2008.  While the hourly rates may have increased, these increases have been offset by a decrease in other funding to students (see the graphic).  Read more about the reasons behind the U of T strike here.

uofT

At York, Contract Faculty, TAs, Graduate Assistants, and Research Assistants are also on strike.  Some of their concerns centre around job security and the issues created when increasing international student tuition is not reflected in pay.  A recent video reminds everyone that this is all part of a struggle to protect the quality of education.

CUPE 3909 stands in solidarity with Academic Workers facing worsening working conditions.  Read our letter of support below.

Download (PDF, 264KB)

THE STRUGGLE AGAINST THE NEOLIBERAL UNIVERSITY

CUPE-3909-FACEBOOK-BANNEROn Wednesday, February 25 at 4:00 pm in the Marshall McLuhan Hall (University Centre), CUPE 3909 will host a presentation and discussion with Dr. Henry Heller who will talk about the effects of neoliberal policies at the University of Manitoba and other universities in North America, as well as the need to oppose them.  Presentation followed by discussion, tapas, and a cash bar.  Facebook event

STOP THE CUTS RALLY January 27, 2015

16209025350_d33cf9819c_o16396435085_40878472b0_oStudents and staff gathered at the Engineering Atrium before the Board of Governors’ meeting

IMG_4150

 

 

 

Speeches by student representatives from the GSA, UMSU, and Jenn Black, VP Unit 1 for CUPE 3909

 

16210521357_0af40c3a50_o

16209023730_91cf0450fb_oWhile some students occupied the Board of Governors’ meeting, the rest went for a march

16394703701_16b358326d_o16396448095_6b38851035_o16210217749_d3c0ae2f44_o

 

Inside the Administration Building, along the bus station, through University Centre

 

IMG_4209

 

And back to the Engineering Atrium

Read VP Unit 1 Jenn Black’s speech            2015 01 27 STOP CUTS RALLY

RESISTING THE NEOLIBERAL ONSLAUGHT ON EDUCATION

submitted by Karl Koth, VP Social Policy

The Problem

Over the last few months, we have highlighted in the Newsletter what we see as one of the most serious threats to our positions, as well as to the emerging ambience which surrounds our society: the neo-liberal onslaught on the education system, in general.

Just last week President Barack Obama announced his plan to provide the first two years of community college education free to students in the USA. It was but one of his proposals to reduce the socioeconomic inequities that are plaguing our societies in various ways. Obviously this was also a two-pronged attack on ignorance and adversity, and for those reasons the reaction to this proposal has been swift. It was greeted with acclamation by many students too cash-strapped to attend college, but it was also condemned from some obvious forces on the neoliberal Right, as expected.

From my perspective, the reason for the attacks from the Right is transparent. What is most feared is the possibility of an educated population, one especially honed to think critically. It must be an irksome threat to those who would keep populations either incapable of critiquing societal problems, or unearthing the machinations of large corporations. That an educated, critically thinking, mass of people is a threat to the Right, should be as obvious and thus we can understand their continuing attack on education, both at the secondary and the tertiary level.

To put the matter succinctly: a dumbed-down population will put up with a lot more of the invasive, exploitative tactics of the corporate world, than one honed on critical analysis: thus the neo-liberal attacks on our education system.

Scope of the Neo-liberal Assault

For proof that there is indeed an assault on the entire system, that this assault is a pervasive and universal one, we need not look far. It includes the public school system, especially secondary schools, and stretches through the community colleges to universities.

Henry Giroux, (whose articles we have published here from time to time) had this to say about  secondary education and the attempt to subsume it under the corporate agenda:

“Neoliberalism…. is also a mode of pedagogy and set of social arrangements that uses education to win consent, produce consumer-based notions of agency and militarize reason in the service of war, profits, power and violence while simultaneously instrumentalizing all forms of knowledge.”  See original here.

Further, the following excerpt from an article by Kevin McKay, writing in Academic Matters: Journal of Higher Education, outlines the scale and reasons for the corporate attack on the college system in Ontario:

“As governments in the 1980s and 1990s embraced a neoliberal ideology, a competing vision of the colleges emerged. This new vision emphasized corporate organization, privatization, entrepreneurship, and inter-institutional competition. On today’s college and university campuses, the two visions are locked in conflict. At stake is whether post secondary education continues to fulfill a progressive mandate centered on education as a tool for social justice and change, or whether it succumbs to a neoliberal agenda driven by government austerity and private interest.”  See original here.

The Method of Attack

How the attack is being carried out has now become clear to us: attack the very curriculum areas that provide first rank critical thinking, namely the Liberal Arts, and half the job will be done.

David Suzuki , while on his cross-country Blue Dot tour last November, visited the U of M. He spoke about the need to see the environment, not as a specific, isolated, compartmentalized, “niche” issue, but to “enshrine the right to a healthy environment  in the Constitution.” And while also criticizing the intrusion of the corporate world into the universities, made inter alia the following remarks concerning  the Liberal Arts and their place in the university.  Suzuki was interviewed by none other than U of M President, David Barnard.

BARNARD: What would be your perspective on the responsibility- or the possible response by universities to this kind of disintegration, this compartmentalization?

SUZUKI: Universities have enormous potential, it would seem to me. But you see, I got a bachelor of arts degree. At Amherst it was felt that in order to be a fully educated person you had to get a liberal arts degree. So, even though I did an honours degree in biology, I was never allowed to take more than half my courses in science. I had to take courses in literature, in philosophy…  To train people with a bachelor of science degree, with maybe one course in English in freshman year, is absurd!  People going out and using the most powerful tools humans have ever had and not having any background in philosophy or religion, I mean, I think that’s a failure of our educational system. And to me, the biggest change I thought was the universities going and welcoming corporations and private companies into the university and taking money from the corporations. You just have to go into the department of forestry at UBC to see why environmentalists like me were fighting against the professors. You see all these huge signs that say ‘donations given by’ and all of the [names of the] forest companies. And that’s what the forestry department thinks they’re doing: training people to go out and service the forestry industry. A huge mistake- to bring corporations into universities.

“Conversation with a Visionary,” On Manitoba: Connecting Alumni and Friends of the University of Manitoba, Winter 2014/15, pp. 11-13.

Our (CUPE 3909’s) Response

To further explore these concepts, we have planned a presentation/discussion for February 25th, at 4:00 p.m. in the Marshall McLuhan Room, at which Professor Henry Heller will present ideas relevant to this important topic.

Precarious Employment in Academia

AcademicAlone (1)All over North America, universities are hiring increasing numbers of contract and adjunct instructors.  Sessional academic workers are teaching more courses, but most are still working under precarious conditions.  CAUT (The Canadian Association of University Teachers) recently held a panel to discuss the rising reliance on contract workers at universities.   Read their comments here.

Corporatizing Universities, 2005

v39n5_400_520_c1For those interested in a little background, but specifically tied to our own University of Manitoba, the September/October 2005 edition of Canadian Dimension is particularly apt.  Among other articles touching on the privatization of and corporate influence on Canadian universities, there is an article that delves into the attempt by the U of M to suppress the film “Seeds of Change” which documented the takeover of Manitoba agriculture by that agribusiness vulture, Monsanto.  It examines the connection between the University and Monsanto, especially the invitation to Monsanto to set up shop in the University’s Smartpark.